Canine Education – Introduction

Training Collar Method – Objectives, Motivation and Discipline

Article contributed by Han-Sing, Gan

Today there are a lot of talks on the revolutionary positive reinforcement methods, and the traditional training collar (a.k.a. Choke collar) method is frown upon as inhumane and even cruel.  And the treat training is touted as the revolutionary method to educating our canine companion.

I have asked myself some fundamental questions to establish what would be most reasonable for our dogs:

Q:  Dogs (which is descended from wolves) is a pack animal, therefore, how does the pack function together?

A:   There are functional hierarchies in the packs, with an Alpha male and female, who alone reserve the rights to breed and to eat first.

Q:  How are these hierarchies formed, and how is the Alpha male/female selected?  Do they give food to the rest of the pack as salaries/reward when they want them to fall in line (obedience) with the pack hierarchy?

A:   Alpha Males are established by proving that he is the strongest in the pack; this is done through fights and the winner will pin the others by holding the other down by the neck in a firm grip in the mouth.  Correction for stepping out of line for a dog is done in the same method, be it a pup or an adult.  Never do the Alpha Males reward any dog in the pack for falling in line with the pack hierarchy with food, the acceptance of the dog by the Alpha is reward in itself.

Q:  When do the dogs get rewarded with food then?

A:   During the successful hunt of a prey.  The dog that brought down the prey will usually enjoy the feast just after the Alpha.

Q:  Dog training is compared with Dolphin’s training, and horse whisperer training discovered by Grant Golliher, are they the same and can the precepts be interchangeable?

A:   Dolphin’s training are usually involved with stunts and deep sea retrieval mission, similar to dog’s agility or search/tracking training, relies on the predatory drive of the animal.  The concepts of inducing the drive of the animals to perform a certain exercise or activity are totally interchangeable.  The horse whisperer, Mr. Grant Goliher, which revolutionized the taming of wild horses in the acceptance of the saddle and bridle involves his observation of how wild horses’ behavior of acceptance in a herd, and recognizing the herd leader leading to the join-up (a term he used where the horse will be tame and desire to join up with the leader and ultimately accepting saddle and the bridle – note: Goliher did not change the tool in the taming of the horse, ropes and whip are still used).  The observation of the animal’s natural behavior and applying methods to alter those behaviors to be acceptable by humans is necessary to improve on how we train and to be more effective.  The emphasis of Mr. Goliher’s method is the reading of the horse body language, e.g. the licking, and head nods; this concept of paying attention to the body language of our dogs (e.g. licking, paw raise, ears position) during training will enhance the training result by recognizing the different moods the dog is trying to communicate.  However, dogs are very different animal from horses, and the tactical methods may be different.

Therefore, coming back to the issue of training collar.  It is in the opinion of this writer that training is a method, and the measure and responsibility of the use is entirely in the hands of the handler.  All training must be measured, fair and reasonable from the perspective of the dog, not the handler.  For the training collar to be effective professional trainer had emphasized that the collar should be loose for at least 80% to 90% of the time; otherwise the training would be ineffective.

There are various types of training since man first domesticated animals; the various types of training have very different goals and objectives and it is important to understand the differences, reviews the effectiveness of the methods used and not jump onto any bandwagon of canine education.

As in any education, there is always objective, correction and reward.  The reward would be the motivation to accomplish the objective, while the correction is the control from straying from the established objective.  Therefore in canine education, there should be an objective for your dog and yourselves to achieve, and reward for the dog and yourselves have to appropriate and reasonable.


Canine education can be broadly divided into 2 categories:

Compulsion Education:   

Obedience training is categorize into compulsion education, as it involves the shaping of the behavioral habits of the dog that is sharing our habitation.  To the dog, compulsion education is the establishment of the rules of the pack and their habitation living habits.  The reward for this training is the acceptance into the pack and agreement of the Alpha.  This will determine the fundamental relationship between the dog and the owner/handler.  Food rewards will be deemed as bribery to the dog.  In compulsion education, consistent praise (reward of acceptance) and correction (maintenance of discipline) is the foundation.  Inconsistent praise or correction (or inappropriate correction) will render the training ineffective.  The objective of the dog in compulsion education is the acceptance of the owner/handler through communication through body languages, voice tone and discipline, and the communication of this should be handled in a reasonable, fair but firm manner.  Dogs can handle a correction well (contrary to most belief) and will not see it as torture, if it were dealt a fair and consistent hand.

Inducement Education:

Training which uses the natural instinct or ability of the dog is categorize under inducement education.  It involves the invoking of the drive of the dog to perform a task or exercise using a certain stimuli (food, or the thrill of the chase, hunting drive).  Agility, tracking, fly-ball, search/rescue, hunting and herding exercises are all part of this.  For certain specialized task requires dogs which are specially bred for the activity, therefore not all dogs will be successful in all activities; for example, while an Australian Shepherd or a Border Collie will happily herd for hours, a Beagle or Pointer will probably fail to achieve this.  Alternatively, the Beagle or Pointer will excel in hunting exercises as compared with the Shepherd Breeds.  Inducement education is trainings using games and even food to invoke the dog’s natural instinct and drive to perform a task that is in their natural ability in a given environment.

Many dog owners/trainers failed to see the distinctions between the 2 categories of canine education, and accept praise will accompany correction in obedience training.  Resulting in frustrated owners and equally frustrated and confused dogs, which in turns results in communication problem and behavioral problems later.  To make the matter worse, the different forms of training are mired and become a mesh of confusion with activist touting the “humane” method of training in obedience.  Which the methods used is neither new nor revolutionary but used in inappropriate settings.

 

Email Doggie Site

Page last updated on 12 March 2002

Please note reprints of pictures and articles on this website are not allowed unless accompanied by written consent of webmaster.

Copyright © 2000-2001 Doggie Site. All rights reserved.